Comments for Stubblog

Comment on document.getElementById() vs IE by Claudio Klemp

Claudio Klemp — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:46:46 +0000

Same problem… ;-)

Solved thanks to you

Claudio

included this reference here in the source code

Comment on IE can’t set name attribute dynamically. by fysjcchrfmrk

fysjcchrfmrk — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:47:26 +0000

cdhqpeplowem

Comment on Installing PsycoPG2 on OSX by Georgina Wald

Georgina Wald — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:56:41 +0000

Hi – so sorry for the delay in getting in contact. I was flagged up about your tweet regarding the UK Domino’s website. We did have a slight problem on Friday night – but can you give me some more details please? Can you drop me an email please?
Thanks. Georgina – Corporate Communications Manager.

Comment on Cute kittens are not as stupid as they sound. by kitten lover

kitten lover — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:59:14 +0000

cool :D

Comment on The Premier League is Heading for Disaster by greglynch

greglynch — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:17:53 +0000

i think the prem is fin and i reckon
that if anything its geting more challenging more competition with man c with there millions and all

Comment on The Premier League is Heading for Disaster by chrisutd07

chrisutd07 — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:35:48 +0000

you’re spot on with the fact that winning is the key to these clubs staying afloat. at the same time, i can’t blame the clubs/businessmen for the lack of regulations/rules set by fifa, uefa and the fa. they’re just taking advantage of the market.

i wrote an article about it here: (more on the man utd debt, but it applies to all):
http://thebleacherbums.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/the-united-debt-no-need-to-panic/

Comment on How to tell when your site is dead? by Stuart Grimshaw

Stuart Grimshaw — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:40:41 +0000

(Originally posted on our Uservoice forum) Ringers are there for people who don't have an email address, but mainly for when you have to add someone last minute who isn't going to play every week. When you invite players, you're inviting them to join your team, not to invite them to play in a game. Each week you organize the match it uses that email address to invite them to play and they get a URL to click to say they can play. Once enough people say they can play, Who's Playing will choose 2 balanced sides, based on the ratings each player. You also get the option to swap players over if you think it's not done a very goof job (which at this point could be quite likely, and with the help of people testing the app, it will get better) You've also got the opportunity to just add players to a match if they sit next to you or something and it's just easier to ask them. Hope that helps! I'm going to look at the text that goes with sending invites just to make it obvious you don't have to enter email addresses for each and every game. (Follow the rest of this conversation on our Uservoice forum)

Comment on How to tell when your site is dead? by rick

rick — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:19 +0000

I’ve voted for some screen casts

Some of our team just looked at it and we cant understand the user interface. The others dont want to use it for this reason. I will persevere though…

Intial thoughts:

1) Explain what Ringers are!
2) Why can I only add 10 of them?

We have a pool of around 20 players who I currently email at the beginning of the week. I dont want to have to paste all there addresses in every game!

How do I add them to the site so that I dont have to keep adding them?

Comment on IE can’t set name attribute dynamically. by Ryan

Ryan — Tue, 05 May 2009 03:17:05 +0000

Actually there isn’t a good workaround for IE if you’re creating an element from another element (i.e. cloneNode). As far as I can tell, to overwrite the old name you’ll need to innerHTML the parent node, and then do a search and replace on the old name attribute. This is annoying, because at least in my case, the clone will be under the same parent as the original…

Comment on Government needs to stop wasting money on big IT projects. by Craig Andrews

Craig Andrews — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:24:37 +0000

There are two separate issues here. If an API were made available for the public to access, it would have the same comprehensive specification process as the current monolithic projects. The same data would be presented, but in a machine readable way rather than the current, barely human readable way.

This would work in a very similar way to Google’s current set of APIs. The APIs are competently and effectively designed to serve Google’s needs, but it means that anyone can throw something together that works in no time. The integrity of the data is assure, and the ease of access is too.